According to the two scholars, both well-known experts on the subject, in its original version Shi‘ism was entirely centred on the relationship between the faithful and the imâm. Thanks to the patient work of Western and Iranian researchers, the imâm is shown to be God’s supreme revelation, historically incarnating Muhammad’s own flesh and blood through Ali.
Notwithstanding a necessary note of caution, it would appear that the oldest texts are quite explicit in saying that the imâm is “God’s Face to the world”, that part of the divinity that is knowable (unlike God’s intimate life which is unknowable according to Islam). Likewise the imâm is thought to embody a strong messianic element linked to the struggle for the instauration of the Kingdom of Justice, which early on becomes projected into eschatological time.
When the chain of historical imâms ended in the 9th century, Shi‘ites went through a crisis of faith. But gradually an idea took hold among them, namely that the imâms had delegated their power to legal scholars and that, given the latter’s legitimacy, not all temporal political regimes were necessarily bad. In the second part of the book, we follow this doctrinal development and see the growing importance of the Shia clergy up to the times of Khomeini and the encounter with the Western revolutionary tradition. In the final part, the authors focus instead on a number of philosophers who developed a non-political vision of Shi‘ism, whilst keeping alive the neo-Platonic heritage. For these masters, a relationship with the imâm after his disappearance (or ‘Occultation” according to Shia tradition) is possible through inner enlightenment.
Who is right? “Between obedience and hope, making a choice divides the faithful, separating him from himself. Should he just listen to the inner imâm in the solitude of a silent initiation? Or should he get involved in the affairs of this world in order to change it and thus fulfill the teachings of the prophet and the imâms? And what is this change? How can it be realised? Through an inner transformation that works patiently on history, or through an external transformation of society and politics?” (359-360 pp) So far Shi‘ites have not yet found an answer to such questions,
Stay up to date: sign up for our newsletter
For insights and analysis subscribe to our biannual journal